<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Steven Clift's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/steven_clift"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/517/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/517/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-09-16T12:02:54-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Seventeen online debates and counting...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/7680/seventeen_online_debates_and_counting" />
    <id>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/7680/seventeen_online_debates_and_counting</id>
    <published>2007-09-15T12:47:49-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-09-16T12:02:54-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Steven Clift</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Charlie Rose" />
    <category term="Huffington Post" />
    <category term="Jeff Jarvis" />
    <category term="online debate" />
    <category term="Slate" />
    <category term="Steven Clift" />
    <category term="yahoo" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It's time to set the record straight on the history of online political debates, in the wake of press reports and claims that this week's Yahoo!/HuffingtonPost/Slate debate was the first.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Cross-posted from <a href="http://www.dowire.org/notes/?p=374">Democracies Online</a>.</p>
<p>OK, I'm ticked.</p>
<p>Back in 1994 Scott Aikens and I put together the <a href="http://www.e-democracy.org/1994/top.html">world's first online candidate debate</a> as part of Minnesota E-Democracy. It was a state level debate. Today, E-Democracy.Org has a <a href="http://pages.e-democracy.org/E-Debates">resource center on e-debates</a> here: <a href="http://pages.e-democracy.org/E-Debates" title="http://pages.e-democracy.org/E-Debates">http://pages.e-democracy.org/E-Debates</a>.
</p>
<p>
In 2000, I worked on the general election <a href="http://www.webwhiteblue.org">Web White &#38; Blue Presidential Rolling Cyber Debate</a> in which Yahoo! was a partner.  The <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19970111062521/democracynet.org/podium/">Democracy Network of the Center for Governmental Studies</a> in 1996 hosted something they called a digital debate as well.
</p>
<p>
Then today, a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6993233.stm">reputable source like the BBC says</a> the <a href="http://debates.news.yahoo.com/">Yahoo Democratic Candidate Mashup</a> - <a href="http://debates.news.yahoo.com" title="http://debates.news.yahoo.com">http://debates.news.yahoo.com</a> - is the "first online-only debate." And <a href="http://news.google.com/?ncl=1120643440&amp;hl=en&amp;topic=t">Google news is compiling similar stories filled with this misinformation.</a>
</p>
<p>
This may be the first online-only Presidential primary debate with video.  <a href="http://www.politicsonline.com/content/main/firsts/">Politics Online keeps a nice list of online political firsts</a>. If you <a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=first+online+debate&amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;toggle=1&amp;cop=mss&amp;ei=UTF-8">search Yahoo for the phrase "first online debate"</a> leading off their debate site, you get a link to our 1996 e-debate in the top ten.
</p>
<p>
The other day I blogged <a href="http://www.dowire.org/notes/?p=369">my detailed proposal</a> for all to steal on how a good online debate should be designed. It builds off the <a href="http://e-democracy.org/e-debates">Minnesota Gubernatorial E-Debate</a> in 2006.  I do hope this Yahoo!/<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/the-candidate-mashup-is-l_b_64362.html">Huffington Post</a>/<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2173700/">Slate</a> online debate goes well. We need more online efforts which force substantive interchange among candidates that also bring out the voices of citizens. I
</p>
<p>
If this was really a "debate" I would expect to see round one video responses followed by a second round where candidates choose who to respond to in detail (video, audio, text, etc.). The Internet is the perfect medium for in-depth rebuttals with supporting links. That is why the E-Democracy.Org format requires rebuttals from candidates on a select number of major themes. We even allow candidates to rebut from the road via a telephone to MP3 audio application.
</p>
<p>
Online news expert Jeff Jarvis has blogged a couple zingers titled <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/14/poor-yahoo/">Poor Yahoo</a> and <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/13/the-yahoo-presidential-mush-up/">The Yahoo Presidential Mushup</a>. Other <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;q=presidential+mashup&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wb">bloggers are weighing in</a> as well.
</p>
<p>
What I like about this candidate "conversation" - the viewer can decide which candidates to view on specific issues and on the Yahoo site they are encouraging people to discuss the debate on their <a href="http://mb.debates.news.yahoo.com/yahoo/Democratic_Candidate_Mashup/">message boards</a>.  What I don't like - most questions are not credited to Internet users, the official discussion is in a walled garden that prohibits outside linking rather than encouraging, then aggregating a web 2.0 style voter conversation across the web (see <a href="http://e-democracy.org/e-debates/EDebateNewsChallenge-Public.pdf">my detailed proposal - PDF</a>.
</p>
<p>
In the general election, there can be no exclusive online presidential debate BUT if we all work together we can create a web 2.0-savvy/fully syndicated/creative commons/open source style e-debate that is fundamentally interactive and inspirational to voters and unavoidable by the major candidates.
</p>
<p>
P.S. I should note that when this <a href="http://yhoo.client.shareholder.com/press/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=239007">press release came out last winter</a> I <a href="http://blog.e-democracy.org/posts/82">blogged about this</a> and I sent an e-mail to the contacts on the press release correcting the record and offering to share advice. I also e-mailed Charlie Rose who repeats the false "we're first" claim in their introduction video. Overstating their originality once, no big deal. But again and again. Come on folks - <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/09/14/slideshow-the-candidate-_n_64487.html">you all look smart enough</a> to check your facts.
</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
