- RNC Protest Twitterer "Dispatches" from 1,800 Miles Away
- Daily Digest: Palin's Thunder Unleashes Fundraising Avalanche -- for Dems
- Thoughts on the Palin Email
- RNC Protestors Mastering Mobile Tools to Organize, Outfox Police
- Daily Digest: Sarah Palin Has a Posse
- Dog Whistles, Community Organizing and Online Fundraising [UPDATED--Obama on Track to Raise $10M By Tonight]
- It's All Performance: St. Paul Police Capture Show They're Part Of
- Biotech Lobbyists Busy Handing Out "I Blog for" Swag
- Liberals Gather in the Shadow of Xcel
- Beyond the Mobile Hype In Election '08
By Joshua Levy, 12/03/2007 - 10:52pm
Some quick thoughts about tonight’s MTV/MySpace presidential dialogue (gosh that’s a mouthful; we need an acronym).
The word on the street is that John McCain was a big hit. While I definitely noticed some bored stares and hair-twirling, the students I spoke to were genuinely impressed by McCain’s trademark straight talk and, I think, a little surprised that he came off so sincere.
It was ironic to find that actually being at the event felt less participatory. The audience couldn’t vote on whether McCain answered the question, and couldn’t register their agreement or disagreement, and there were little to no followup questions directed at McCain. Moderator and MTV VJ Gideon Yago said that he “didn’t want to grandstand,” implying that following up would be taking to much time away from McCain.
Shouldn’t the in-person dialogue — like a the old fashioned townhalls that inspire so many online forums — be more participatory than this?
Given the criticism of the the recent CNN/YouTube Republican debate, a lot of folks were trying to compare the two tonight. The CNN debate was criticized for not involving the public in the selection of questions; in this event, there really is no editorial gatekeeper. The producers know vaguely what the question topics will be beforehand based on surveys of the students attending, but the real answers come up on the spot. In that sense, I think this is a better format than the problematic CNN/YouTube model.
However, no one got the chance to press McCain. He said “ugh” when asked about immigration, but he does have real opinions about it that may or may not differentiate him from other candidates, and he should be pressed to answer the questions. Instead, we got what Micah Sifry called an infomercial about McCain.
To take away: format is generally good but we need more involvement, followup questions, and toughness from the audience.
Recent blog posts
Recent comments
- Thanks for the comments. Of
1 hour 46 min ago - I should post a disclaimer
18 hours 24 min ago - She's Legit
18 hours 43 min ago - You may be an exception...
20 hours 52 min ago - Palin Email is True
21 hours 2 min ago - UPDATE: LIVE EXAMPLE
22 hours 19 min ago - Exactly! Mobile Use At It SHould Be
22 hours 22 min ago - Open? How So?
1 day 18 hours ago - Community organizers
1 day 21 hours ago - iambiotech.org is an open site
1 day 23 hours ago
Most Emailed
- RNC Protestors Mastering Mobile Tools to Organize, Outfox Police
- Dog Whistles, Community Organizing and Online Fundraising [UPDATED--Obama on Track to Raise $10M By Tonight]
- Biotech Lobbyists Busy Handing Out "I Blog for" Swag
- Liberals Gather in the Shadow of Xcel
- Daily Digest: GOP Convo Burns Up the Tubes

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
Was this an improvement?
I think it's great that MySpace and MTV are partnering on these dialogues, and they seem to genuinely be trying to marry the internet and TV. By including the live feedback loop with the pie-charts showing how viewers online are responding to what they're hearing the candidate say, they've definitely injected a new element into the conversation. (Though I'd like to see some way of checking who is voting, or at least how many people are voting overall, because this interactive element is obviously open to being gamed.)
That said, it really bothers me to see, yet again, the "town hall" format turned into something that is a far cry from a real town hall meeting. The young people sitting on the set around McCain looked mainly like props in, yes, an infomercial. Josh reported from inside the hall that the kids were told to behave themselves and not interrupt or otherwise signal their displeasure with anything the candidate might say.
Tell me how that format differs from a staged "people's democracy" meeting in pick-whatever-dictatorship-you-like. Where is the freedom of speech in such a setting? Are we supposed to cede all agency to the MTV hosts, who are themselves actors in a TV show, to perhaps offer context or push back on one of the candidate's answers?
I am tired of all the learned and exhibited deference to authority that pervades our culture. If we have learned anything from Iraq, it's that we have to think for ourselves and not defer to authorities just because they are our betters.
In theory, the culture of the internet is intrinsically more freewheeling and confrontational and democratic than anything we get from capital-intensive, capital-owned Big Media. But when we combine the two, we shouldn't trade a little more online interactivity with our would-be rulers for a lot less in-your-face interactivity.
Not to single out McCain, but in his case this would mean -- at a minimum -- someone asking this simple follow-up question when he states, with all the sincerity and passion that he is notably capable of, that he knows how to win in Iraq. How exactly, Senator? How many lives? How much blood? How much treasure?
In a real town hall, or even a two-bit democracy, we would have heard a follow-up question on that seminal point. God, it almost makes me wish Jim Lehrer had been asking all the questions. (Almost.)