Please see my response to your post over at Mother Jones
http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/index.html#4743
By Alan Rosenblatt, 06/27/2007 - 10:29am
Blog this and blog that
Blog it all and blog a blogging brat
We don’t want a campaign that looks just like that
I don’t want a campaign that looks just like that
I am not a self-hating blogger, though I am a fan of Captain Kirk and the Sex Pistols. Personally, I think blogs are swell. I know bloggers. Bloggers are friends of mine. But online campaigns are not just about bloggers. However, after reading so much mainstream press coverage about Politics 2.0 lately (for example, in Mother Jones this month), one might conclude that the sun rises and sets only on blogs and the bloggers that write them. There is so much more to online campaigning that we do ourselves a great disservice when we narrow our focus too much on blogs.
I have often called blogs the hammer of our generation. Have you heard of the hammer theory? You know, the one that goes, “Give a child a hammer and suddenly everything looks like a nail.” Hammers are very useful tools, but not if you have to stitch together two pieces of fabric, not if you have to dig a hole, and not if you have to write a letter. A hammer has a range of uses, but it is hardly the only tool in your belt.
Another thing I often say is, “Tools are not strategy.” Blogs are tools. And bloggers are the craftsmen wielding this tool. And many bloggers, like Kos, Reynolds, Marshall, Delany, and many others wield their tool very well. They make a significant impact on the political arena. They have helped to further democratize politics by providing more voices and sources in a world where the mainstream media has become an oligopoly, representing a corporate perspective more than the people’s perspective. Democracy thrives of diverse voices deliberating the issues of the day and blogs have clearly added voices.
While blogs have helped to usher in a new era of enhance citizen engagement, they have neither done it alone nor do they represent the ultimate expression of this new era. Opportunities for citizens to engage in political discourse have existed online since the very beginning of the internet, on USENET, in IRC, via LISTSERVs, on many websites offering discussion forums, grassroots advocacy software for emailing policymakers, and other channels. And the new social media and social network sites like YouTube, Flickr, Digg, Facebook, MySpace, Care2, Change.org, and Townhall provide ever more opportunities for citizens to learn about the issues, engage in discussions, take action, and become part of civic-minded communities.
John Locke would be delighted. The new political landscape offers so many ways to facilitate rational discourse for finding solutions to the problems of the day. In the long-run, this can only be good for democracy, good for political campaigns, and good for the people.
So while it is true that blogs can be a difference-maker in campaigns, both positive and negative, the other aspects of Politics 2.0 are at least as important. As Micah Sifry and Andrew Rasiej spelled out in their Politico article the web is playing an enormous role in all aspects of politics, including fundraising, volunteer organizing, message dissemination, and voter engagement through social networks and social media.
All in all, Politics 2.0 is very exciting. And while blogs play a key role in this new landscape, they are like one village in a vast world where networked technology is affecting how we do all things in politics.
Alan, do you actually read?
Yes, But Slowly
Read your post, left a comment there, looking forward to talking more.
Alan Rosenblatt
I wrote about the Mother Jones package
At my blog, PressThink, I wrote about http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2007/06/27/mother_jones.html
the Mother Jones package and what I think was wrong with it.
"Mother Jones invites you to question if the Politics 2.0 revolution really lives up to its hype."
And PressThink asks whether the printing press progressives at Mother Jones have any kind of grip. "They saw the Internet and freaked: this can't be real. Recovering their bravery, they decided to debunk it."
See Micah Sifry in the comments tangling with Mother Jones writer Josh Harkinson.
We Settle Back Into Rational Discourse
Jay, I just read your post and thought you were right on. I know I have often relied on the posing two straw men extremes to trigger a healthy debate in my classes, but I have found it often too inflammatory in conversation, despite my best intentions. Its the weave of an analysis that makes it compelling, not its volume.
So I am glad the volume has settled down. I have read the post and comments on MoJoBlog and those on Jay's. I think there are a lot of important questions being thrown about here. And my Lockean sensibilities tell me this is a great thing.
Josh, you alluded to some issues you would like to see us discuss here at TechPresident. What specifically? As you can see, I love discussing. :)
I am certain we all don't agree on everything. I can live with that and it appears all of us can, too.
The fact that MJ has been online since 1993 is evidence that what we are dealing with is anything but "new," but it has gone through a major technological upgrades and a huge growth in market share in the past few years. So the potential has grown.
As someone who has been knee deep in the web of politics since the days of MJ's web launch, I am happy to hear all of this passion when people write and talk about this stuff.
For all our complaints about the lack of deeper attention we in the political and media spaces give to networked politics, my own discipline, Political Science, is far worse. There is a cadre of political scientists that get it, but by and large most departments and political science journals just don't.
So, I take my conversations where I find them. And prefer them to be curious and passionate. This one certainly is.
Alan Rosenblatt
Executive Director, Internet Advocacy Center
AKA DrDigiPol (drdigipol.com)
Some More Thoughts
Alan had asked what, in particular, I'd like to see Techpresident write about. Well, in general, I think the site has been great at casting a critical eye on how politicians are using the web, but it hasn't carried that critical eye to the blogosphere quite as much. Maybe this is outside of the site's mandate, and if so, that's understandable, but I do think the blogosphere is becoming increasingly intertwined with the power elite, and somebody needs to cover that beat. For more about what I'm talking about, see Dan's discussion here:
http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2007/06/4758_blogger_hubris...
Recent blog posts
- Daily Digest: McCain's Grassroots Moment
- Google Grabbed Most of Obama's $16 Million in 2008
- #inaug09: Twitter Vote Report, the Next Generation
- Sell Obama stimulus and create new transparency era by democratizing data
- Obama Pushes Citizen Service Out of the Nest
- SoapBlox Burnout Points to Vulnerability in Left's Infrastructure
- PdF's 2009 Top 50 Political Blogs
- Daily Digest: CTO Watch -- The Rising Stock of California PhDs
- CES and Tech Politics
- Small Tents vs. Big Networks: Recreating the GOP
Recent comments
- Some participants in the
3 hours 30 min ago - As a result, one of the
3 hours 34 min ago - As if my taxes were not enough?
8 hours 38 min ago - already working together to fix
13 hours 34 min ago - Obama CTO from Silicon Valley
1 day 4 hours ago - Where McCain and the organized parted ways
1 day 4 hours ago - olur mu sizce
1 day 8 hours ago - Whether there will be more
1 day 18 hours ago - very interesting article....
1 day 19 hours ago - thank you
1 day 23 hours ago

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
Politics 2.0 Guide
Great article. Maybe techpres could make a guide to politics 2.0 that organizes the various "villages", noting the major / influential sites in each, their history, popularity, the differences between them, where they are headed, etc. I think this would be an interesting and informative resource.