- Little Known Fact: Sara Palin Storms Twitter
- Daily Digest: Split-Screening Obama Speech and Palin VP Pick
- Daily Digest: The Mile-High Club
- BarackObama.com in Denver: "Phrase Not Found"
- More Bloggers, Please
- Daily Digest: It *Is* Okay to Contact This Voter
- Where Do Bloggers Slot into the Democratic Universe?
- Schweitzer Snarks on Bloggers: "It Ain't a Pretty Sight!"
- The Medium is the Text Message
- Online Social Networks in Politics: Promise, Frustration and...
Daily Digest: 7/9/07
By Joshua Levy, 07/09/2007 - 11:19am
By Joshua Levy, 07/09/2007 - 11:19am
The Web on the Candidates
- Gaby Wood, in yesterday's Guardian, reviews the details of the "YouTube election" for British readers. Most of the examples -- the "1984" ad, Obama Girl, "I Feel Pretty," and so on -- are familiar to readers of this site, but Wood takes an interesting look at the idea of voter-created campaign ads. "The notion of a 'citizen ad' is an intriguing one, suggesting as it does both a citizen's arrest - the idea of doing something without pay for the public good - and Citizen Kane. You can, from the privacy (and affordability) of your own home, have an effect akin to that of a mogul," Wood writes. "Is YouTube the ultimate form of democracy, then, a means by which voters can have their say and politicians can really listen? Or is it something to be feared, a kind of anarchic 24-hour surveillance?" The answer to this question -- which continues to be asked about the web itself -- isn't as stark as Wood suggests.
- An anti-Hillary Clinton Facebook group, "One Million AGAINST Hillary Clinton," now has more supporters than the successful group from which it derives its name, "One Million Strong for Barack." The anti-Clinton group claims an impressive 348,556 members, while the Obama group has a 309,674. When gauging a candidate's popularity on Facebook, how should we factor in this level of unpopularity? Do the negative numbers cancel out the positive numbers? And should we take the group's claim that "whether you are supporting Rudy Giuliani or Mitt Romney, John Edwards or Barack Obama a single goal exists, to ensure that another Clinton is not put into the White House" at face value, or is this a partisan Republican group? (Thanks, Patrick.)
The Candidates on the Web
- Last week Joe Biden sat down for a long interview with Salon's Walter Shapiro, in which he discussed Iraq, fundraising, celebrity candidates, and adjusting to the reality that everything he says and does could end up online. Responding to the growing influence of the left-wing bloggers on the Democratic candidates, Biden said, "They don't own the Democratic Party. What are they talking about?" The notoriously chatty Biden acknowledged that "there are two sides to my being straightforward and candid." When his every utterance is videotaped and blogged, "I'm going to get myself in trouble. But the only thing I decided to do -- I can't start trying to calibrate all this stuff. I really believe that at the end of the day, the public in the primaries, as well as the general election, are going to judge me for all of who I am."
- Mike Huckabee has launched a new site design, and it is good. The design is reminiscent of Rudy Giuliani's site, except it's much cleaner-looking and doesn't look broken. The campaign blog -- recently bolstered by the addition of blogger Vincent Harris -- is tied directly into the site, so that the front page image and headline link to a blog post; all of the site's news and updated content occur on the blog. A nice, but buried, feature is the video archive, which displays links to and descriptions of Huckabee's YouTube videos, which have become more dynamic and interesting of late. To get to the page, you have to first click on "Newsroom," and then click on the "Video" link on the right-hand side of the page. The feature would be better noticed if it, like the blog, was a main attraction on the front page. [UPDATE] The url of the site has changed as well, to www.mikehuckabee.com.
- The ripples, the ripples!: Amateur art-film director and Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel finally explained the meaning behind his "Rock" campaign video, in which Gravel, standing on a rocky beach, stares unblinkingly at the camera for a couple of minutes before turning around, picking up a rock, and hurling it into the water. Yesterday, Gravel told George Stephanopoulos on ABC's "This Week" that the video is "a metaphor not only for a presidential candidate, for any citizen. The ripples, the ripples. It's a metaphor, George. The ripples show the effect, and then you march off into the horizon."
In Case You Missed It...
Talking to a friend who donated $15 to Barack Obama, David All finds a story of the Long Tail in action.
Tags: Facebook | Hillary Clinton | Joe Biden | Mike Gravel | Mike Huckabee
more from Joshua Levy's blog | login or register to post comments | subscribe to the daily digest
more from Joshua Levy's blog | login or register to post comments | subscribe to the daily digest
Recent blog posts
Recent comments
- Thanks you
18 hours 20 min ago - It was leaked
1 day 13 hours ago - the text message
1 day 14 hours ago - There is a more personal way coming soon ...
3 days 13 hours ago - The whole online political
3 days 15 hours ago - Thank you very much for this
3 days 21 hours ago - Barack just emailed me a link to Michelle's speech
3 days 22 hours ago - Have you found a high quality version?
4 days 4 hours ago - I read your post title
4 days 14 hours ago - BBC vid
4 days 14 hours ago
Most Emailed
Tags
10Questions
1984
2007 Campaign Web Index
ActBlue
Al Gore
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson
Chris Dodd
CNN
debates
Dennis Kucinich
Duncan Hunter
Elizabeth Edwards
Email
Eventful
Facebook
FISA
Fred Thompson
fundraising
google
Hillary Clinton
Hitwise
Howard Dean
Huffington Post
Iowa
Jeff Jarvis
Joe Biden
joe trippi
John Culberson
John Edwards
John McCain
Mike Gravel
Mike Huckabee
Mitt Romney
Mobile
MoveOn
MTV
MySpace
netroots
New Hampshire
Newt Gingrich
Obama
Off the Bus
online fundraising
pdf2008
RNC
Ron Paul
Rudy Giuliani
Sam Brownback
Second Life
social networking
Spotlight
strategy
Tom Tancredo
transparency
Twitter
video
yahoo
YearlyKos
YouTube
Navigation
© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |

print
email
delicious
digg
technorati
Anti-Hillary facebook group
It is unlikely that the Anti-Hillary facebook group is a "partisan Republican group." Its comparative size to the Obama group, and some of the discussions within the Obama group in support of it, leads me to believe there is a significant overlap between the two groups. Certainly there is a large chunk of Republican voters, but hatred for Hillary is popular for Obama and other Democrat supporters as well.
It should be noted that the group membership numbers alone do not tell the whole story. The Obama group began long ago and peaked at 325,000 members in mid-April. Since then, due partially to the natural turnover rate for Facebook users leaving old groups, the Obama group has lost members for 70 consecutive days, often at triple-digit rates. (It has lost 50 more since this blog posting, down to 309,626)
Meanwhile, the anti-Hillary group is slightly newer and growing at a massive rate, gaining over 1,000 members per day throughout much of May and all of June (it passed the Obama group on June 10), only now "slowing down" to about 700 new members per day. Certainly this group will eventually experience turnover as well, but its peak is already higher than the Obama's group peak and showing no signs of letting up anytime soon.
The comparative numbers will be 400,000 to 300,000 before long.