<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - John McCain: Tolstoy in My Inbox - Comments</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;John McCain: Tolstoy in My Inbox&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Keep testing</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox#comment-2097</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;testing once isn&#039;t sufficient...you should be testing at least monthly...trying difft formats to smaller segments of your list...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if you are doing this regularly...there is no harm in reassuring conservative readers of techpresident...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks Patrick for pushing this discussion&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:04:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ChrisM</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2097 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s the content</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox#comment-2096</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Having personally experimented with the &quot;stripped down&quot; approach long before it was all the rage, I can tell you it&#039;s not a panacea. Of course, &quot;stripped down&quot; can mean those dorky emails staff are supposedly sending to each other in Outlook but &quot;accidentally&quot; got sent out through the mass email software. 99% of the time, it&#039;s the *content* not the formatting that matters. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama and Clinton&#039;s emails are something different than &quot;stripped down.&quot; They are just very well-written emails that sound like they could have been written by a real person. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And given that they have very big playgrounds to experiment within (~2 million users each) I trust what they&#039;re doing more than most. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:28:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Ruffini</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2096 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yes</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox#comment-2095</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;My personal guess is yes, but let&#039;s not let data and facts get in the way of making a blog post on techPresident :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eric Frenchman&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Internet Strategist&lt;br /&gt;
Connell Donatelli Inc&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 22:28:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>EricFrenchman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2095 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>good post</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox#comment-2094</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know if they&#039;ve experimented with the stripped down approach at all?  They are clearly clinging to the traditional email newsletter approach and I&#039;m wondering if they have data to back up the decision.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bivingsreport.com&quot; title=&quot;http://www.bivingsreport.com&quot;&gt;http://www.bivingsreport.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:53:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Todd Zeigler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2094 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The problem with that...</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox#comment-2093</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;General election voters aren&#039;t the ones signing up to your email list. The &quot;chorus&quot; is. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use your website to persuade and your email list to gin up your base. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:39:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Ruffini</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2093 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Obama and Hillary&#039;s are short</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox#comment-2092</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the problem with your analysis. McCain is playing toward the general election for votes from questioning voters.  Obama and Hillary are still raising money from the &quot;chorus&quot;.  That is a fundamental difference.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:18:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Freedomfighter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2092 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John McCain: Tolstoy in My Inbox</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good online strategy is simple: reflect the very best of your candidate offline. John McCain offline is transparent, accessible, and willing to answer any question. John McCain online is stilted and awkwardly asking me for money. There&amp;#8217;s a fundamental disconnect. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/25414/john_mccain_tolstoy_in_my_inbox#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/taxonomy/term/496">Authenticity</category>
 <category domain="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/taxonomy/term/117">e-mail</category>
 <category domain="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/taxonomy/term/7">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/taxonomy/term/169">transparency</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:24:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Ruffini</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25414 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
