<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>techPresident - annenberg - Comments</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/taxonomy/term/22377</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;annenberg&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How to make the &quot;truth meter&quot; follow the politician around</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/6378/fact_checking_the_candidates_politifact#comment-1119</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Great idea, but I&#039;d like to see a system that follows you around (the way a reputation does in oral cultures), so there&#039;s less cover provided by the fact that the ratings are tied to particular locations on the web, which most people probably wouldn&#039;t end up visiting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recently wrote on O&#039;Reilly ONLamp about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2007/08/proposal_a_politicians_reputat_1.html&quot;&gt;an idea to color-code politicians&#039; names&lt;/a&gt;, potentially anywhere they appeared, based on truthfulness (as determined by searching factcheck.org):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s based partly on University of California Santa Cruz researcher Luca De Alfaro&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://trust.cse.ucsc.edu&quot;&gt;Wikipedia trust-coloring project&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:07:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Spencer Critchley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1119 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PolitiFact</title>
 <link>http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com/blog/entry/6378/fact_checking_the_candidates_politifact#comment-1118</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for writing about PolitiFact. We&#039;re really excited about the possibilities and are proud of the site. Just to clarify something: I designed and built the site&#039;s architecture, but I&#039;m not running it. The hard work is being headed up by Bill Adair, the St. Petersburg Times&#039; Washington Bureau Chief, who deserves all the credit for the original idea. Where we&#039;ve put our resources -- into researching and reporting out the statements -- is where we have resources. The Times and Congressional Quarterly have some of the best reporters and researchers around (you can see the whole staff &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/staff/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;). PolitiFact takes those resources and puts them to work in a form and format that I think works on the web far better than, as you wrote, reposting print material. Where we&#039;re thin on resources is on the administrative end, with the people needed to make participation work. Fact checking politicians and writing about it is an old newspaper story -- we know how to do that. But doing it this way is all new to us. Stay tuned. We&#039;ve got more to come. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Matt Waite&lt;br /&gt;
St. Petersburg Times&lt;br /&gt;
PolitiFact.com | mattwaite.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:22:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mattwaite</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1118 at http://techpresident.personaldemocracy.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
